Review follow-up. Ask everyone, and reply to everyone.
Happy customers leave and never write a word. The unhappy one writes two hours later, and their review sits at the top for months with no reply. This piece asks genuine customers for a review at the right moment, and drafts a reply to every one that comes in.
The request is triggered by a real event. An order delivered, a stay completed, a service provided. Not a list of addresses, and not a hand-picked group of customers who seem happy.
Every customer of that kind is asked. Filtering in advance based on the rating you expect is an unfair commercial practice across the EU, as well as a way of fooling yourself.
Every review gets a reply. Drafts arrive ready, including for negative reviews, and a person always sends them.
This page covers a single piece of the system. The other pieces, and how we choose which one to start with, are on the services page.
What changes in practice
Reviews stop being a matter of luck. Today they come in when someone remembers to ask, so there are few of them and often from the wrong customers; with a request tied to a real event, more arrive, and they genuinely reflect the people who come through your door.
97% of consumers read reviews of local businesses, according to BrightLocal's Local Consumer Review Survey. The figure is high wherever it's measured, and it tells you something simple: people check that page before they choose, and everyone checks it.
The second change is in the replies. 80% say they're more likely to choose a business that replies to all its reviews, good ones included, and replying to all of them only becomes possible when the drafts are ready every morning.
An unanswered negative review doesn't hurt because it's negative. It hurts because it looks more believable than all the others.
Asking only happy customers is prohibited, and it's worth knowing that up front
This is the part hardly any service in the sector builds honestly, and plenty sell the opposite as a feature. Directive (EU) 2019/2161 added the following to the list of commercial practices that are unfair in all circumstances, word for word: “stating that reviews of a product are submitted by consumers who have actually used or purchased the product without taking reasonable and proportionate steps to check that they originate from such consumers”.
The same list prohibits submitting or commissioning fake reviews. The so-called review gating approach, which only sends customers to a public review page if they gave a good answer to a private question first, builds exactly the kind of picture that rule is designed to prevent.
So there's only one rule here, and it's not up for negotiation: every customer of the same kind is asked, in the same way. Anyone who doesn't want to write doesn't write, and that's useful information, not a problem to work around.
There's a practical reason too. A profile full of nothing but glowing reviews is obvious at a glance and is worth less than one with a few middling ratings and thoughtful replies underneath, because readers have learned to be suspicious of anything too perfect.
What the system does, step by step
Every request comes from a recorded event and every step leaves a log entry, so you always know who was asked and when.
| Step | What happens | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Eventa real purchase | The request is triggered by an order delivered, a stay completed or a service provided, never by a generic list. |
Everyone who gets the request is a real customer, and your review page reflects your real customers. |
| Timingset for your trade | The right delay is agreed once: straight away after a meal, the day after a stay, once an order has been delivered. |
You ask while the experience is still fresh, which is when people actually reply. |
| Requestto everyone, the same way | The message is the same for every customer of that kind, in their language, with no filtering by expected rating. |
The picture that builds up is one you can stand behind, and nobody can question how you got it. |
| Alertas soon as it arrives | Every new review is flagged with the text, the platform and the customer's history if you have it. |
Negative reviews are seen the same day, not two weeks later by chance. |
| Replydraft ready | A draft arrives that mentions the specific details rather than recycling the same stock phrase, and a person sends it. |
Replying to every review becomes a five-minute job, and it's obvious from outside that there's someone behind it. |
Identical replies are easy to spot
A reply that thanks people with the same sentence twenty times in a row tells readers nobody actually read anything. Under a list of reviews, repetition is obvious to anyone scrolling the page, so each draft mentions the specific details of that visit or that order.
On negative reviews, the draft doesn't argue or explain why the customer is wrong. It acknowledges what happened, says what has changed or what's being looked into, and takes the rest offline. Readers aren't judging the incident; they're judging how you respond.
When a review contains a serious accusation or a refund request, the system doesn't draft anything and passes it to a person with the full history. Those are the cases where the wrong sentence costs more than silence.
What goes out on its own, and what waits for a person
The review request goes out on its own, because it simply follows up on something that happened and commits the business to nothing. You keep the switch to turn it on or off, channel by channel.
A public reply never goes out on its own. A reply is the business speaking on a page future customers will read, and a person signs it, including replies to positive reviews.
Where an automatic message reaches a customer, it says in one line that it comes from a system. From 2 August 2026, Article 50 of the AI Act applies, and how we say it is on the AI transparency page. The reasoning behind keeping a person in the loop is on our page about the principles we build by.
Same mechanism, different name in every trade
The mechanism is identical; the right moment to ask isn't. It's worth looking at your own case, because getting the timing wrong is the most common reason people don't reply.
| Sector | When to ask | Where you see it |
|---|---|---|
| Hospitalityaccommodation and events | The day after checkout, when the trip is over and the whole experience is still in mind. For an event, once the photos or other materials have been delivered. |
|
| Restaurantsand bars | The same evening or the next morning, because the memory of a meal fades fast, and after three days all that's left is the bill. |
|
| Food and agricultureand export | Once the order has been delivered, not when it ships, because the customer is judging the product that arrived, not the parcel that left. |
What this piece doesn't do
It doesn't buy reviews and never writes any. Both are prohibited under the list the directive refers to, and they're also the fastest way to get a profile removed from the platform it's on.
It doesn't make negative reviews disappear. Only the platform can do that, and anyone promising otherwise is selling something that doesn't exist. What you can do is reply well and reply quickly, and have enough genuine reviews that one bad evening doesn't read like a verdict.
It doesn't reply on your behalf. It prepares and suggests, and the public voice stays with the person who signs. Filling the calendar is a separate piece, handled by booking recovery.
Questions and answers
Can we ask only satisfied customers for a review?
No, and it's not a question of style. Directive (EU) 2019/2161 added two things to the list of unfair commercial practices: presenting reviews as coming from genuine buyers without taking reasonable steps to check, and submitting or commissioning fake reviews.
Picking who to invite in advance based on the rating you expect produces a picture that doesn't reflect your real customers. The system asks every customer of the same kind, and anyone who doesn't want to reply simply doesn't.
When does the request go out?
Once the experience is over and it's still fresh in their mind, and the timing varies by trade: after an order is delivered, the day after guests check out, the same evening after a meal.
The request is triggered by a recorded event, meaning a purchase or stay that actually happened, not by a list of addresses.
What happens when a negative review comes in?
You get an alert straight away with the review and that customer's history, plus a draft reply ready to edit. The reply is always sent by a person: a negative review is the one moment a customer tells you what went wrong, and it deserves a person.
97% of consumers read reviews of local businesses, so the people reading that reply are mostly the ones still making up their minds.
Is it worth replying to positive reviews too?
Yes, and it's the part hardly anyone does. In the BrightLocal survey, 80% of consumers say they're more likely to choose a business that replies to all its reviews, not just the critical ones.
Replying to every review takes a few minutes a day if the drafts are already written, and becomes impossible if they have to be written from scratch whenever someone remembers.
How do you measure whether it's working?
By the number of new reviews each month and the share of customers who get the request, which in many businesses starts out as a small fraction. The second number is the share of reviews that get a reply, and how long the reply takes on average.
The average rating isn't a good measure of this piece: it depends on the service, not on who asks for reviews, and seeing it rise because only some customers were invited would be a problem, not a result.
Notes on sources
- The 97% of consumers who read reviews of local businesses and the 80% more likely to choose businesses that reply to every review come from BrightLocal's Local Consumer Review Survey, 2026 edition. The sample is 1,002 US adult consumers, so it measures consumer habits in the United States: the direction matches what we see in Italy, but the number doesn't transfer as it stands. The survey is updated every year, and figures from earlier editions are still widely quoted.
- The ban on presenting unverified reviews as genuine and the ban on submitting or commissioning fake reviews are in points 23b and 23c of Annex I to Directive 2005/29/EC, added by Directive (EU) 2019/2161 and transposed into Italian law in the Consumer Code. They're legal provisions, so there's no sample. We don't give legal advice: how they apply to your case is for you and your adviser to decide.
- This page doesn't report results achieved for a client, because this piece hasn't yet been delivered to a client. The tests mentioned are functional checks run in a test environment.
The other pieces in this group
Customers who are out there but don't find youFifteen minutes, with your case in front of us.
How many of the customers you served last month got a review request, and how many of your reviews have a reply? If both numbers are low, they're the same problem seen from two sides. In fifteen minutes on the phone we'll look at it together and tell you where it makes sense to start, even if we never end up working together.
You'll speak to Mattia Esposito, who then builds the system: there's no salesperson in between. If you'd rather measure things yourself before talking, the Diagnostico (in Italian) is twenty questions and five minutes.